Being Better than Good

This has been on my mind lately…

We as advertisers/marketers/creatives have a unique gift to influence people through our work. Therefore, I believe we have a responsibility to ensure we’re influencing people to do the right thing.

This goes beyond the client, beyond the project, and begs the question, “Is this helping or harming others?”

The creative industry (not just advertisers – if you build a website, you’re guilty too) too often promotes over-consumption, encrouages a damaging addiction to consumerism, and promises a false happiness through material wealth that we’ve seen fail people over and over. And yet, we get in a room, hammer out an idea, talk ROI, talk strategy; but rarely do we stop and ask if we should be promoting this idea, this product, this company, this paradigm.

It’s somewhat cliche to say, but with power comes responsibility. If we really do have the ability to influence others more than the average joe, it’s inexcusable to use that gift without first understanding the impact.

  • http://www.14four.com RyanMoede

    In a way, this is part of why I'm struggling with the new DIESEL campaign ” Be Stupid.” Even at the most nuanced understanding of what they're going for falls flat, in my opinion, and just seems to encourage well, being stupid. I want advertising that asks more of us – VW's Fun Theory or W+K's recent Levi's work both are wonderful examples of advertising being more than good.

  • MJC

    Absolutely, and bravo to all of the above. Be a leader in ideology – as good intentions should overcome greed, exploitation, and other bad forms of human selfishness often promoted by marketing. Those with these gifts (ability to influence) do bear moral responsibility to avoid taking advantage of less critical thinkers, or to encourage behavior that is harmful to culture and or individuals.

  • http://paulisakson.com paulisakson

    Just because we can, doesn't mean we should.

    Nice post, Josh.